Bulova Wants Review of Voting Efficiency
Fairfax County Supervisor says group should look at long waiting times at some polling spots and recommend ways to improve.
Fairfax County Board of Supervisors Chair Sharon Bulova says she will recommend a commission to look ways to improve the county's efficiency on Election Day.
Bulova says she was concerned about long lines, wait times and other voting issues.
Voter turnout for the 2012 election in Fairfax County was 80.5 percent. In the last presidential election, the turnout was 78.7 percent (with 72,501 fewer registered voters than today), county officials said. Meanwhile, absentee voting in the county was down 2.7 percent from 2008.
Lines and waits varied widely in Fairfax County. In Reston, reported waits varied from a minute to about 30 minutes at peak time in the morning.
Bulova says she waited just 20 minutes at Villa precinct Tuesday morning at about 8 a.m.
At other locations, though, voters reported waits of over an hour. The last vote in Fairfax County was cast at 10:30 p.m. at the Skyline precinct in Bailey's Crossroads, which means voters in line by 7 p.m. had to wait three-and-a-half hours before finally casting their ballots, county officials said.
“While all together the day went well, I think it would be beneficial to examine what lessons we can learn from the 2012 Election,” Bulova said in a statement. “I plan to present this issue to the Board of Supervisors at our next meeting and suggest the formation of a bipartisan commission to identify ways to reduce lines, decrease wait times, and streamline our election process.”
The next Board of Supervisors meeting takes place on Tuesday, Nov. 20.
John Farrell, Reston resident and general counsel for the Fairfax County Democrats, says he is opposed to a task force. He says the Board of Supervisors has little influence over the state board of elections, but there are changes the BOS is authorized to make that could impact the process immediately.
"A task force is a way to get nothing done for an extended period of time," he said.
He suggests immediate ways the Board of Supervisors can impact the process, such as: redrawing precincts; funds for replacing faulty touch screens with optical scan machines; increasing pay for election officers from $100 to $125 a day; and auditing of the mail-in absentee process.
aab
8:27 am on Friday, November 9, 2012
Va should open up the in person absentee vote. To vote early you need an official excuse, addresses , phone numbers, ssn, date of birth etc. The excuse has to be approved. Crazy. All I wanted to do was vote. On voting day, all I would have had to produce would be my Dominion Power bill. We should be making it easier to vote, not harder.
Maggie
8:35 am on Friday, November 9, 2012
I agree. I wanted to vote early, but had no valid reason to, so I waited an hour in line on election day.
Melissa Baldwin
9:24 am on Friday, November 9, 2012
I had no wait when I voted, I had two children with me and was reprimanded for allowing my 10 year old son to do the voting while I held my 10 month old daughter. He was just pressing the buttons for me. Another thing, I didn't feel the voting tables were very private. They should have been turned around so our backs were to the wall. The people behind me could see what I was doing.
Richard Holmquist
10:01 am on Friday, November 9, 2012
I agree with you about the orientation of the voting machines. Although your body blocks people from seeing what you're doing, it's still a bit disconcerting. At my polling place I thought it was due to the location of the electrical outlet more than anything, but that could be addressed next time with an extension cord.
Don't blame the election official for asking your son not to push the buttons. The election officials are told in their training that children may not cast the ballots for their parents. Beside it being the law, it could cause all sorts of problems if your son submitted your ballot before you were ready. Of course, there are both pleasant and unpleasant ways to go about explaining that to a voter.
Sandra
9:33 am on Friday, November 9, 2012
I would like to know why Virginia allows 1 voting machine per 750 people, while in Maryland it's 1 per 250? Does Virginia value its residents' time less than Maryland does? I think it's likely that some idiot beancounter figured that if you average out numbers of people over the day, there should be no backup. However, in reality there will be way more people coming before and after work. At our precinct they only allocated 2 voting machines. They did offer paper ballots, but I can't stand them, and most others in the line with me felt the same way. After all of the hype before the election, and with the projected closeness of the presidential race, I would assume that voting officials would have known that there would be a lot of people coming to vote. So why have only 2 machines for an entire precinct??? Something definitely needs to be fixed!
JAK
9:49 am on Friday, November 9, 2012
People in Spotsylvania Co. waited six hours. We are lucky to even be afforded this right, & be glad that we don't have to dodge IEDs while doing it. My precinct is at Armstrong, & we had lines just like Aldrin above. However, the wait was minimal even when I was there during the final surge, & I was completely through in 20-30 min. max. My Father went during lunch-hour when roughly 1,000 people all showed up at once, with 500 people in line at any given time, yet the wait even then was no more than an hour (During the day there were lulls with very short lines). All final voters made it in by 7:00 PM, & our precinct of North Point was finished by 7:15 PM. This is all despite a record number of 5,400 registered voters. There were five computer stations setup at my location, as well as three tables consisting of four paper ballot stations each. Seriously, it was extremely well planned & coordinated, & I give immense credit to the Elections Officers, school custodians, & various other volunteers who made it a great experience (If anybody is interested in efficiency they should talk to the Chief for our precinct, because it all ran smoothly. The poll watchers I talked to found it to be a favorite location of theirs, & all got along well). Everyone in line chatted it up, & the sense of community was strong with all of us there. I wouldn't trade the experience for anything!
Martin Tillett
10:08 am on Friday, November 9, 2012
In some states the voting machines assigned to precincts were done by partisan election officials. As was the case in areas of Ohio, districts leaning towards one party with more registered voters received fewer voting machines than districts leaning towards the other party with fewer registered voters were assigned a larger number of voting machines. I my view those kinds of shenanigans are the real election fraud and integrity issues, not the alleged voters claiming to be someone they are not when casting their ballot that our State legislature claimed was hurting the integrity of the vote thus requiring voter ID legislation. Perpetrators of the ID laws got their comeuppance election day when a massive turnout of voters that understood the real intent of the voter ID measures to suppress voting came to cast their vote and stood in line as long as was necessary to keep their franchise to vote.
Maybe the State and County election boards should be co-chaired with both a Democrat and a Republican. Having that balance might keep partisans on both sides in check and eliminate such nonsense as voting machine apportioning to voting precincts.
T Ailshire
11:09 am on Sunday, November 11, 2012
Better yet, with people who don't give a rat's patoot about political parties.
Ann
10:51 am on Friday, November 9, 2012
I voted at the VDOT building in Fairfax. There were only 2 voting machines and I waited about 1.5 hours at 7:45 in the morning. I don't understand the allocation of machines, but it seemed like we were tremendously underserved. Virginia should have an early voting option to avoid these problems.
DW1976
10:53 am on Friday, November 9, 2012
Look at Travis County. They allow early voting for 12 days starting 2 WEEKS before the election. Oh, and no "excuse" needed. You just go to one of 22 locations where they have polls set up (Oh and they have a MOBILE POLLING station) and vote.
If a similarly sized county in Texas can do that, why can't Fairfax County? Is there some state law prohibiting it?
http://www.traviscountyclerk.org/eclerk/Content.do?code=news.megasite
T Ailshire
11:11 am on Sunday, November 11, 2012
I lived in TX for almost ten years. Early voting is ubiquitous and seamless. In those 10 years, only once did I vote at a polling place on election day. Every other year, I was somewhere with early voting -- malls, shopping centers, grocery stores, etc.
But I guess those who want to vote in more than one place would have to be really motivated here. Maybe it's a voter-fraud mitigation effort.
Martin Tillett
12:36 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012
Well let's see, on election day I was able to use my smart phone to start my car, skype with my cousin in Sweden, do banking transactions, conduct business deals, read several news articles, make orders for personal goods and services, check flight status for visiting relatives and a host of other actions of importance to me in a matter of minutes while casting my vote in the election that morning seemingly took an inordinate amount of time. Anything wrong here folks?
T Ailshire
11:16 am on Sunday, November 11, 2012
In previous years, I had been told no cell phones in the polling place, so I left mine in the car.
What was different this year? I could have been more productive (though I did get an hour's worth of reading in).
Dave Webster
2:10 pm on Saturday, November 10, 2012
Isn't Fairfax County Democratic Party General Counsel John Farrell making contradictory statements here?
First he says that he is opposed to a bipartisan commission being formed in Fairfax County to study ways to alleviate long voter lines because the Board of Supervisors has little influence over the Virginia Board of Elections. He then proceeds to list a series of actions that Fairfax County can take to alleviate long voter lines such as redrawing precincts, funds for replacing faulty touch screens with optical scan machines, increasing pay for election officers from $100 to $125 a day, and auditing of the mail-in absentee process.
According to Mr. Farrell, these things must be done immediately and not after being studied by a commission because commissions are "a way to get nothing done for an extended period of time," What does Mr. Farrell suggest? That Supervisor Foust redraw precinct maps with a laser pointer during a public hearing?
I look forward to Mr. Farrell opposing the use of all commissions of any nature whatsoever on the theory that "they get nothing done for an extended period of time." Lastly, does he seriously believe that increasing election officers' pay from $100 to $125 a day will make any difference?
John Farrell
3:18 am on Sunday, November 11, 2012
Sorry I didn't answer sooner. I've been at the provisional ballot meeting.
I can see how you might think that.
A task force reporting to the Supervisors has no power to implement change. The Supervisors have a limited role in elections administration. They set the boundaries of the precincts and fund the operations of the Election Office. They also can charge the County Auditor to study an area of County operation.
The rest of the details of election administration are, by statute, given to the Electoral Board and the General Registrar not a task force.
If the Supervisors want to get something done, instead of grandstanding with a task force, let them vote on November 20th to authorize advertising to divide Skyline precinct into 2 or more precincts and set the hearing for December instead of waiting for a task force to report.
Fairfax pays is its election officers $100 oer day for 15+ hours. PWC pays their election officers $125. I would pay ours $300 per day; and assistant chiefs $400 and chiefs $500. That's an amendment to the personnel schedule that the Supervisors can adopt in December again without waiting for a task force.
i would ask the General Assembly to require employers to pay election officers the same way they are required to pay jurors. That way the average age of the election officers can fall below 65. That can be part of the BOS legislative package this December without a task force.
I would ask the General Assembly
John Farrell
3:40 am on Sunday, November 11, 2012
to adopt "no excuse needed" early voting, that also can be done now without a task force.
The BOS can fund the opening of satellite in-person on the last Saturday in September and every Saturday through the Saturday before election day. No task force needed for that either.
The BOS can fund the complete replacement of touchscreen machines that are old and worn out with optical scan machines. That transition is coming anyway as mandated by the General Assembly. Far more people per hour can vote through the optical scan machine than on touch screen. That doesn't require a task force either.
The BOS can order the director of OakMarr to let the Election Office use a bigger room than the coat closet set aside for use last Tuesday. That doesn't require a task force either.
Task forces are what Fairfax Government does to hide embarassing situations instead of actually implementing change because its the bad publicity the Supervisors are afraid of, not the substantive need for change.
5 of these Supervisors were told in April that this year's elections would be a train wreck. 4 of them ignored the warning. Quoting one of their staff members. "why should she care, it's not her election?"
Only Sup. Hudgins tried to head off the forecasted problems. The rest ignored the warnings.
Now they want to avoid responsibility by foisting a task force on us.
I'm not fooled and hope you aren't either.
Kathy Keith
7:14 am on Sunday, November 11, 2012
Here are some things Fairfax county could have done to alleviate long lines:
Advertise the bonds and amendments better. My observation: some people took an extremely long time at the machines and clearly didn't know how they wanted to vote. I realize that the Dems and Reps handed out sample ballots--but it appeared to me that lots and lots of people had never even thought about how they wanted to vote on these issues. While waiting, I saw one woman look at the election officer in confusion and ask "What does this mean?" He told her that he could not advise her. I wanted to scream--"If you don't know, just skip it!" Also, she had a sample ballot in her hand--I guess she didn't look at it until she got in the booth, even though she had been waiting in line for some time.
My precinct encouraged people waiting in line to use the paper ballot if they didn't want to wait. My precinct had several tables with privacy screens--later I talked with a friend who said her precinct only had four spaces set up for this. Election chiefs should be encouraged to set up more spaces for paper ballots.
T Ailshire
11:16 am on Sunday, November 11, 2012
The Post's Local Living section had a full voters' guide with candidates profiles, amendment text, and bond issues.
Chairman Bulova sent out a voters' guide.
Delegate Surovell sent out information.
Patch wrote articles.
The State Board of Elections has sample ballots on its web site (without anyone telling you HOW to mark those ballots) for weeks prior to the election.
Anyone who gets to the polls without knowing what's on the ballot is simply lazy.